Hearing Testing Without Production Downtime: Yes, It’s a Thing!

Deanna Lennox • August 9, 2022

Stop Losing Production Time!

Would you let someone from outside of your organization take one of your employees away from their workstation during production time, possibly with no time limit?

The request sounds so unthinkable that most employers would not even respond without more information, yet it happens to an estimated 80% of employers.

When hearing tests are done at an employer’s site for OSHA compliance, an uncharacteristically passive attitude is adopted by management and the test provider is allowed to have an employee for 20-30 minutes, sometimes even more. The test provider may suggest a time estimate for the session but is not accountable to have the employee back by any specific time. Paying ½ an employee’s hourly wages multiplied by 50, 250, or more employees can obviously run into thousands of dollars, but there are even more important considerations.

If one person is gone for 5-10 minutes, the absence can be absorbed, but groups of 4-8 people gone for 20-30 minutes significantly interrupts productivity. The financial loss to the owners or shareholders is far more than just the cost of hourly wages lost, it includes the plant’s output being diminished while the overhead costs that go with it stay as high as ever.

Daily production- A management goal is to achieve a forecasted amount of output in a day. A facility’s systems, methods, software, and workflow all synergize to achieve this forecast. The Company depends on this as the planned daily net profit to owners often equals less than 5% of a day’s production. At financialrhythm.com’s (Campbell, 2020) average net profitability by industry post, Steel and paper/forest products are at 4% and 2% net profit respectively. Using an average of 3%, companies in these industries with $100,000 in daily output would plan for $3000/day in net profit. That is when production is at 100% of the planned rate- things going perfectly. Hold this $3000 in mind while considering the following 2 cases in the Northwestern USA:

1) Auto Battery manufacturer:

A manufacturer of automotive batteries in the Northwest produces batteries on 3 production lines. Manta.com (2019 Manta Media Inc., all rights reserved, 2019) indicates annual revenue of $50-100 million, so it can be said that daily production would be $300,000 if the annual revenue was $75 million. Their hearing tests were being done 4 people at a time, which impacted production to the point that one of the 3 battery lines had to be shut down. Simple math can be used to see what would happen to $300,000 daily revenue if one of three lines got shut down, suffice it to say they were looking for alternatives. In 2019 they changed to doing hearing tests one at a time, and the plant manager’s report was “…not a ripple in production”. Restoring $100,000 to output daily was very attractive

2) Window manufacturer:

A window manufacturer in the NW has committed to LEAN manufacturing principles. They have closely measured their processes, and monitor output knowing the importance of hitting targets. They did on-site hearing testing 4-at-a-time and learned from their monitoring system that production was clearly down by 15%. That 15% cost far more than what the hearing test provider charged.

3) Exotic Metal Casting company:

During annual hearing tests for 350 employees, top management at a castings company looked out of their upper window and noticed a bad sight in the parking lot. 4 employees were in a truck, and 8 others were gathered near it- some recently finished and some waiting their turn. Instinctively recognizing the cost to the organization of this grouping, direction was handed down that changes must be made. They began testing one at a time and the disruption stopped.

LEAN manufacturers may be able to see the costs and benefits more clearly than others, but it affects all employers. The mistake at the core is that hearing test providers have built an expectation that they can show up and take control of the workforce with no one holding them accountable, holding employees - and production - hostage to their own production schedule. Somehow it has become usual and customary to make their schedule the priority. Testing one at a time puts control back in the employer’s hand. That is the method used by many employers with over 500 people, but now it can be insourced along with all the profitability.

< Older Post

Newer Post >

Is Your Respirator Program Still Compliant in 2026?

By Mary Jane Bumanglag • May 30, 2026

In many workplaces, respirators are considered the last line of defense against airborne hazards. But even the best respirator won’t protect workers if the program behind it is outdated, incomplete, or inconsistently followed. As industries continue to prioritize workplace safety, 2026 is the right time for companies to take a closer look at their respirator protection programs — not because regulations suddenly changed overnight, but because compliance alone does not always guarantee protection. At Anadyne, we believe employers should move beyond “checking the box” and focus on creating programs that genuinely keep workers safe every day on the job. Why Companies Should Review Their Respirator Program Now Many organizations assume that if they passed an inspection or completed fit testing a few years ago, their program is still effective today. Unfortunately, that’s not always the case. A respirator protection program can gradually become outdated due to: Employee turnover Changes in job tasks or exposure risks Improper respirator storage and maintenance Weight fluctuations affecting fit Inconsistent training practices Missing documentation Delayed medical evaluations or fit testing The reality is this: a company can technically remain compliant with minimum requirements and still experience workplace injuries or respiratory exposure incidents. That’s why regular program reviews matter. Compliance Is Only the Beginning Respiratory protection standards are designed to establish minimum safety requirements. However, truly effective programs go further by ensuring workers consistently use and maintain their equipment properly between evaluations and fit tests. A worker may pass a fit test today, but what happens afterward? Are they: Shaving regularly to maintain a proper seal? Replacing filters when needed? Inspecting respirators for damaged seals? Properly storing equipment in sealed bags between jobs? Reporting major physical changes that may affect fit? These day-to-day behaviors determine whether respiratory protection actually works in real-world conditions. What a Complete Respirator Protection Program Should Include An effective respirator protection program should contain several critical components working together. 1. Fit Testing Fit testing confirms that the respirator forms a proper seal on the employee’s face. (objective testing is recommended to rule out known inconsistencies with subjective 'irritant smoke' methods) Even small facial changes, damaged equipment, or improper sizing can compromise protection. 2. Training & Education Training should go beyond simply teaching employees how to wear a respirator. Effective training helps workers understand: Why respiratory protection matters How improper use increases risk How to inspect equipment properly When to replace filters or cartridges Proper cleaning and storage procedures When to report issues or request reassessment The goal is not just passing a test, it’s ensuring workers remain protected every day between tests. 3. Documentation & Written Program Review Proper documentation is essential for both compliance and operational consistency. A written respirator protection program should clearly outline procedures, responsibilities, equipment protocols, training schedules, evaluation records, and emergency processes. Without regular review, written programs can quickly become outdated or disconnected from actual workplace practices. Don’t Wait Until There’s a Problem Delaying a respirator program review is similar to avoiding a routine medical check-up. If concerns already exist, waiting longer often increases the risk of larger problems later. The good news is that most companies can address issues proactively before they become serious safety incidents, compliance violations, or costly disruptions. A review today can help identify gaps early, while solutions are still manageable. How Anadyne Can Help In 2026, Anadyne is proud to expand its respiratory protection services to help companies strengthen workplace safety programs with confidence. Whether you need: Respirator fit testing Program evaluations Training support Written program reviews Guidance on best practices Our team is ready to help you build a program that supports both compliance and worker protection. Schedule a Respirator Program Review Protecting your workforce starts with understanding where your current program stands. Book a consultation with Anadyne today and take the next step toward a safer, stronger respirator protection program.